</nav></nav>{"id":1318,"date":"2015-10-08T10:39:34","date_gmt":"2015-10-08T08:39:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.univie.ac.at\/ehenvorgericht\/?p=1318"},"modified":"2017-10-13T13:12:31","modified_gmt":"2017-10-13T11:12:31","slug":"fruehneuzeit-info-2015-themenschwerpunkt-ehekonflikte-vorschau-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/?p=1318","title":{"rendered":"Fr\u00fchneuzeit-Info 2015 | Themenschwerpunkt Ehekonflikte | Vorschau 1\/6"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>streitpaar \u2013\u00a0Verfahren in Ehesachen<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>Fr\u00fchneuzeit-Info 26 (2015)<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Erscheinungsdatum:\u00a0November 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Die diesj\u00e4hrige Ausgabe der <em>Fr\u00fchneuzeit-Info<\/em> widmet sich dem Themenschwerpunkt <em>Ehekonflikte\u00a0<\/em>und\u00a0richtet den Fokus auf die vielf\u00e4ltigen, oft komplex ineinander verstrickten Gerichtsverfahren vor kirchlichen und weltlichen Ehegerichten sowie die darin von den Streitparteien (respektive deren Anw\u00e4lten) vorgebrachten Konfliktfelder. Der obrigkeitliche Umgang mit \u201eeigenm\u00e4chtigen Trennungen\u201c und bigamen Verbindungen sowie die Frage nach den Trennungs- bzw. Scheidungsfolgen bilden weitere Schwerpunkte des Heftes.<\/p>\n<p>Die Zeitschrift wird in wenigen\u00a0Wochen erscheinen. Bis dahin wollen wir interessierten Lesern und Leserinnen w\u00f6chentlich zwei der insgesamt zw\u00f6lf Beitr\u00e4ge vorstellen. Den Anfang machen Bronach Kane und Duane Henderson mit je einem Beitrag zum Sp\u00e4tmittelalter:<\/p>\n<pre><strong>Courtship, Childbearing &amp; Gender in Late Medieval England\r\nBronach Kane<\/strong>\r\n(in English language)\r\n\r\nExisting studies of premarital pregnancy in late medieval English society have focused on manorial fines imposed on sex and childbearing before marriage, as well as the Church\u2019s attempts to channel sexual activity into the bonds of matrimony. This article uses extensive litigation from the church courts to argue that, while childbearing mattered little under formal canon law, pregnancy and parenthood were integral to narratives of courtship and marriage in practice. For female plaintiffs in particular, discourses of stability, cohabiting, and love underpinned legal arguments to enforce marriage contracts. Male parties could, in turn, exploit cultural perceptions to depict sexual relationships as temporary and based solely on desire. Despite these gendered patterns, young women could appropriate and reconfigure cultural models that were hostile to female sexuality in order to advance claims of marriage. Ultimately, this article argues that the discursive agency exercised by female plaintiffs and deponents suggests that gendered models were more flexible in social practice where courtship and childbearing were concerned.<\/pre>\n<pre><strong>Der ungl\u00fcckliche Bund\r\nZur Praxis der gerichtlichen Ehetrennung vor dem\r\nFreisinger Offizialat im Sp\u00e4tmittelalter<\/strong>\r\n<strong>Duane Henderson<\/strong>\r\n(in German language)\r\n\r\nThe paper investigates the practice of marriage separations \u201cfrom bed and board\u201d (<em>a mensa et thoro<\/em>) at the bishop\u2019s court of Freising at the end of the fifteenth century. Beginning with a brief summary of the position of late-medieval canon law and legal opinion defining the grounds for a separation \u201cfrom bed and board\u201d and regulating its modalities, the study points out the extent of regional and individual variations in the application of these rules as has been revealed by recent research. On this evidence it becomes apparent that the medieval practice of marriage separation must primarily be studied at the local jurisdictional level, such as is documented in the records of the consistorial court of Freising (1424\/1462-1524). Drawing from this both detailed and comprehensive source material, the paper presents the case study of a prolonged marital conflict which was pursued in a series of legal suits from 1476 to 1481. In its various phases, this court battle addresses the major legal and social questions involved in late-medieval marital separation cases in Freising and reveals the problems and advantages of a legal settlement.<\/pre>\n<p>Bestellungen \u00fcber das\u00a0<em>Institut f\u00fcr die Erforschung der Fr\u00fchen Neuzeit<\/em>: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.univie.ac.at\/iefn\/data\/uploads\/documents\/bestellschein_fnz-info.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bestellschein<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>streitpaar \u2013\u00a0Verfahren in Ehesachen Fr\u00fchneuzeit-Info 26 (2015) Erscheinungsdatum:\u00a0November 2015 Die diesj\u00e4hrige Ausgabe der Fr\u00fchneuzeit-Info widmet sich dem Themenschwerpunkt Ehekonflikte\u00a0und\u00a0richtet den Fokus auf die vielf\u00e4ltigen, oft komplex ineinander verstrickten Gerichtsverfahren vor kirchlichen und weltlichen Ehegerichten sowie die darin von den Streitparteien (respektive deren Anw\u00e4lten) vorgebrachten Konfliktfelder. Der obrigkeitliche Umgang mit \u201eeigenm\u00e4chtigen Trennungen\u201c und bigamen Verbindungen sowie &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/?p=1318\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Fr\u00fchneuzeit-Info 2015 | Themenschwerpunkt Ehekonflikte | Vorschau 1\/6<\/span> weiterlesen <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[114],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publikationen"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1318"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2559,"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318\/revisions\/2559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ehenvorgericht.univie.ac.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}